Overdue Calibration Finder
Findings · finding 8 of 12

Calibrated in house with no procedure named

An in-house calibration is done to a documented procedure: IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.1 asks the internal laboratory for technical procedures inside a defined scope, ISO 13485 7.6 for documented procedures, 21 CFR 211.68 for a written program and 21 CFR 58.63 for written standard operating procedures.

When the finder raises it

Fires for an instrument calibrated in house with no procedure named. Raised only under a ticked standard that asks for one: IATF 16949, ISO 13485, ISO/IEC 17025, 21 CFR 211 or 21 CFR 58.

A question for the calibration lead

Which procedure is it done to, and is that procedure inside the internal lab's scope?

Clauses behind it

5 across the standards
StandardClauseApplies to
IATF 16949IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.1 Internal laboratoryan automotive supplier holding IATF 16949 certification
ISO 13485ISO 13485 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipmenta medical device maker holding ISO 13485 certification
ISO/IEC 17025ISO/IEC 17025 6.4 Equipmenta testing or calibration laboratory accredited to ISO/IEC 17025
21 CFR 21121 CFR 211.68 Automatic, Mechanical, and Electronic Equipmenta drug maker under 21 CFR 211
21 CFR 5821 CFR 58.63 Maintenance and Calibration of Equipmenta laboratory running nonclinical studies under 21 CFR 58
IATF 16949 7.1.5.3.1Internal laboratory

An internal laboratory has a defined scope, forming part of the QMS documentation, that covers its ability to deliver the inspection, test or calibration services needed. As a minimum it specifies and applies requirements for: whether its technical procedures are adequate; how competent its staff are; testing of the product; its ability to perform the services correctly and with traceability to the relevant process standard (and, where no such standard exists, a defined method for confirming measurement capability); customer requirements; and review of the associated records. Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 or an equivalent may serve to show that it conforms.

What a certification body auditor asks to see: Documented laboratory scope in the QMS; Technical procedures, personnel competence records and traceability evidence; Record reviews
Where registers usually fall short: Laboratory scope undefined so tests are run outside capability; Traceability to process standards not demonstrated
Source: IATF 16949:2016, automotive production quality management

See it on the specimenAll twelve findings