Overdue Calibration Finder

AS9100: what it asks of a calibration register

AS9100D adds to ISO 9001 7.1.5 a process for recalling equipment that needs calibration or verification and a register showing each item's type, unique identity, location, and the method, frequency and acceptance criteria of its calibration or verification.

Findings that cite it

FindingClause
1. Overdue: the due date worked out is earlier than the as-at dateAS9100D 7.1.5
2. Due before the audit, or inside the warning windowAS9100D 7.1.5
3. No due date can be worked out: no interval or no last calibration recordedAS9100D 7.1.5
4. Out of tolerance as found, with no impact assessment recordedAS9100D 7.1.5
AS9100D 8.7
AS9100D 10.2
5. Overdue and used for product acceptanceAS9100D 8.7
7. Traceability not recorded in this registerAS9100D 7.1.5
9. Certificate reference not recorded in this registerAS9100D 7.5.3
10. Lost, quarantined or out of service but marked for product acceptance, or lost with no impact assessmentAS9100D 8.7
11. The register's own due date disagrees with last calibration plus intervalAS9100D 7.1.5
12. Two rows with one asset IDAS9100D 7.1.5

AS9100D: every clause cited

4 of the 63 held

The requirement text is our statement of each clause, read against the copy we hold and cited to it; it is not the standard verbatim.

AS9100D 7.1.5Monitoring and measuring resources

The resources needed for monitoring and measurement to give valid, reliable results are identified and provided; they are suitable for the task and kept in good order, and records show they are fit for purpose. 9100 adds a process for calling in monitoring and measuring equipment that needs calibration or verification, and a register of such equipment showing its type, unique identity, location, and the method, frequency and acceptance criteria for calibration or verification; the register covers test hardware and test software, automated test equipment, plotters that produce verification data, and equipment owned by employees or supplied by customers. Where traceability of measurement is required, or the organization regards it as essential, equipment is calibrated or verified at set intervals against standards traceable to international or national standards (with the basis recorded where none exists), marked to show its status, and protected against adjustment, damage or deterioration. Under 9100, calibration and verification take place in suitable environmental conditions. If equipment is found to be unfit, the organization establishes whether earlier results were compromised and acts accordingly.

What a certification body auditor asks to see: Register of monitoring and measuring equipment with the six 9100 fields; Recall process for equipment due for calibration; Traceable calibration records, status identification and impact assessments of out-of-tolerance findings
Where registers usually fall short: Test software and ATE outside the calibration register; Personally owned gauges uncontrolled; No recall process, so equipment runs past its due date
Source: AS9100D, aerospace quality management
AS9100D 7.5.3Control of documented information

Documented information that the QMS and the standard require is controlled so that it is available and fit for use at the place and time it is needed and is properly protected. Control covers how it is distributed, accessed, retrieved and used; how it is stored and preserved, legibility included; how changes are controlled; and how long it is kept and how it is disposed of. External documents judged necessary are identified and controlled, and records kept as evidence of conformity are guarded against accidental change. Under 9100, obsolete documents retained for any reason are kept from accidental use by removing them or by suitable marking or controls, and where documents and records are held electronically, processes are defined to protect the data against loss, unauthorized or accidental change, corruption and physical damage.

What a certification body auditor asks to see: Document and record controls covering the listed activities; Controls on obsolete documents kept for reference; Defined electronic data protection processes (backup, access control, integrity)
Where registers usually fall short: Obsolete drawings at the workstation; No defined backup or data protection for electronic records; External documents (customer specifications) uncontrolled
Source: AS9100D, aerospace quality management
AS9100D 8.7Control of nonconforming outputs

Outputs that fail to conform are identified and controlled so they are not used or delivered by mistake; this covers nonconforming product made in-house, received from an external provider or found by a customer, and action matches the kind of nonconformity and what it affects, including where it is found after delivery. Under 9100, the process for controlling nonconformities is kept as documented information and sets out: who is responsible for, and authorized to, review and decide on nonconforming output, and how the people who make those decisions are approved; containment of any effect on other processes, products or services; prompt notification of the customer and relevant interested parties about nonconformities affecting products already delivered; and corrective actions for nonconformities found after delivery. The options are correction; segregation, containment, return or suspension; telling the customer; and acceptance under concession, authorized by a relevant authority and, where applicable, the customer as well. Under 9100, a decision to repair or to use as is may be carried out only once approved by someone authorized to represent the design organization or holding delegated design authority, and, where the nonconformity departs from contract requirements, once the customer has authorized it. Scrapped product is marked clearly and permanently, or kept under positive control until it can no longer be used; counterfeit and suspected counterfeit parts are controlled so they cannot find their way back into the supply chain; corrected outputs are verified again; and records describe the nonconformity, what was done, any concessions granted and who decided.

What a certification body auditor asks to see: Documented nonconformity control process with disposition authority and approval of decision makers; Customer and interested-party notification records for delivered nonconformities; Design-authority and customer approvals on use-as-is and repair dispositions; Scrap marking and counterfeit part controls
Where registers usually fall short: Use-as-is dispositions taken by production without design authority; Scrap parts leaving the site unmarked; Escapes not reported to the customer in a timely way
Source: AS9100D, aerospace quality management
AS9100D 10.2Nonconformity and corrective action

When a nonconformity arises, complaints included, the organization: acts to contain and correct it and to handle what follows from it; assesses whether its causes need removing, by reviewing and analysing it, establishing the causes (under 9100, including causes linked to human factors) and checking whether similar nonconformities exist or might arise; carries out the action needed; checks that the action worked; brings risks and opportunities up to date; and alters the QMS where required. Under 9100 it passes corrective action requirements on to any external provider responsible for the nonconformity, and takes particular steps when corrective action is late or ineffective. Actions suit the effects of the nonconformity. 9100 requires the processes for managing nonconformities and corrective action to be kept as documented information, and records are kept of each nonconformity, the actions taken and the outcomes.

What a certification body auditor asks to see: Documented corrective action process; Corrective action records with human-factors root cause analysis and effectiveness review; Flow-down of corrective action to responsible providers and escalation when actions are late
Where registers usually fall short: Root causes stated as operator error without human factors analysis; Provider-caused nonconformities not flowed down; Overdue corrective actions with no escalation
Source: AS9100D, aerospace quality management