Overdue Calibration Finder

ISO 9001: what it asks of a calibration register

Clause 7.1.5 is the calibration clause of ISO 9001: where traceability of measurement is required, or the organization judges it essential, it asks for calibration or verification of measuring equipment at set intervals or before use against standards traceable to international or national standards, identification so its status is known, and protection; where equipment proves unfit for its purpose, the organization judges whether earlier results remain valid. ISO 9001 asks for traceability; it does not itself ask for an accredited calibration laboratory.

Findings that cite it

FindingClause
1. Overdue: the due date worked out is earlier than the as-at dateISO 9001 7.1.5
2. Due before the audit, or inside the warning windowISO 9001 7.1.5
3. No due date can be worked out: no interval or no last calibration recordedISO 9001 7.1.5
4. Out of tolerance as found, with no impact assessment recordedISO 9001 7.1.5
ISO 9001 8.7
5. Overdue and used for product acceptanceISO 9001 7.1.5
ISO 9001 8.7
7. Traceability not recorded in this registerISO 9001 7.1.5
9. Certificate reference not recorded in this registerISO 9001 7.5.3
10. Lost, quarantined or out of service but marked for product acceptance, or lost with no impact assessmentISO 9001 7.1.5
ISO 9001 8.7
11. The register's own due date disagrees with last calibration plus intervalISO 9001 7.1.5
ISO 9001 10.2
12. Two rows with one asset IDISO 9001 7.1.5

ISO 9001: every clause cited

4 of the 56 held

The requirement text is our statement of each clause, read against the copy we hold and cited to it; it is not the standard verbatim.

ISO 9001 7.1.5Monitoring and measuring resources

Where monitoring or measurement is used to check that products and services conform, the organization identifies and provides the resources needed for results to be valid and reliable. It makes sure those resources suit the kind of monitoring and measurement done and are maintained so they stay fit for purpose, and it retains documented information as evidence that they are. Where traceability of measurement is required, or the organization judges it essential to confidence in the results, measuring equipment is: calibrated or verified, or both, at set intervals or before use, against standards traceable to international or national ones (and where none exist, the basis used is recorded); identified so its status is known; and protected from adjustment, damage or deterioration that would make its calibration status or later results invalid. If equipment proves unfit for its purpose, the organization judges whether earlier results remain valid and acts as needed.

What a certification body auditor asks to see: Register of monitoring and measuring equipment with calibration status; Calibration certificates traceable to national standards; Procedure for handling out-of-tolerance equipment and assessing previous results; Identification and safeguarding of equipment
Where registers usually fall short: Equipment used for acceptance not in the calibration register; Out-of-tolerance findings not followed by an assessment of prior results; Software used for measurement not validated
Source: ISO 9001:2015, quality management systems
ISO 9001 7.5.3Control of documented information

Documented information that the QMS and the standard call for is controlled so that it is on hand and fit for use wherever and whenever it is needed, and is adequately protected against loss of integrity, loss of confidentiality or misuse. The organization deals with: distribution, access, retrieval and use; storage and preservation, including keeping it legible; control of changes, including versions; and retention and disposition. Documented information from outside sources that the organization has judged necessary is identified and controlled, and documented information kept to evidence conformity is protected against unintended alteration.

What a certification body auditor asks to see: Document control procedure covering access, change, retention and disposal; External document register (customer specifications, standards, regulations); Retention schedule and disposal records; Protection of records from alteration (access controls, audit trails)
Where registers usually fall short: Obsolete documents at the point of use; External documents uncontrolled; Records editable after the fact with no audit trail
Source: ISO 9001:2015, quality management systems
ISO 9001 8.7Control of nonconforming outputs

The organization makes sure that any output failing to meet its requirements is identified and controlled so that it is not used or delivered by mistake. It acts on the nonconformity in proportion to what the nonconformity is and how it affects whether products and services conform, and this applies also to outputs found to be nonconforming after delivery. Possible actions include: correcting the output; segregating or containing it; returning it or suspending supply; informing the customer; and getting authorization to accept it under concession. When a nonconforming output is corrected, its conformity is verified again. Documented information is retained that describes the nonconformity, what was done about it, any concession obtained, and who decided the action.

What a certification body auditor asks to see: Nonconformity records with description, disposition, concession and deciding authority; Segregation and identification of nonconforming product; Re-verification records after correction; Handling of nonconformities found after delivery
Where registers usually fall short: Nonconforming product not segregated; Concessions granted without customer authorization where required; Re-verification after rework not recorded
Source: ISO 9001:2015, quality management systems
ISO 9001 10.2Nonconformity and corrective action

Whenever a nonconformity arises, complaints included, the organization responds to it: as applicable it acts to control and correct it and deals with what follows from it. It then judges whether action is needed to remove the causes, so the nonconformity does not happen again or somewhere else, by reviewing and analysing it, finding its causes, and finding out whether similar nonconformities exist or could arise. It carries out any action needed, reviews whether corrective action worked, updates the risks and opportunities identified during planning where necessary, and changes the QMS where necessary. Corrective action must suit the effects of the nonconformity in question. Documented information is retained on what the nonconformities were, what was done, and what corrective action achieved.

What a certification body auditor asks to see: Nonconformity and complaint records with root cause analysis; Corrective action records with effectiveness review; Evidence of checks for similar nonconformities elsewhere; Updates to the risk register and system arising from nonconformities
Where registers usually fall short: Correction recorded as corrective action; Root cause analysis superficial; Effectiveness never reviewed
Source: ISO 9001:2015, quality management systems